Във всички бели държави има партийна система. И там дето си сега е така... май.

А това дето го предлагаш - не става. Няма да намериш кадърни работещи за тая заплата.

http://ekipbg.com/mitut1/

Миро ти го каза 100 пъти. Българина не умее да гради общество. Без общество няма читава държава, няма читави политици, няма читава икономика. Политиците са хората около теб! Нищо по различно.

Икономическите решения трябва да се взимат от финансисти или икономисти.

According to Robert Reich, former Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration, there was a time when capitalism and democracy where almost perfectly balanced. This was the period of 1945 to 1975, which he calls the "Not Quite Golden Age." During this period there was a three-way social contract among big business, big labor, and big government. Each made sure that they as well as the other two received a fair share of the pie. Unions recieved their wages and benefits, business their profits, and regulatory agencies had their power. It was also a time when the gap between the rich and the poor was the narrowest in our history. It was not quite the golden age because women and minorities were still second class citizens, but at least there was hope.

Fast forward to 2007, capitalism is thriving and democracy is sputtering. Why has capitlism become supercapitalism and democracy become enfeebled? Reich explains that it was a combination of things: deregulation, globe spanning computer networks, better transportation, etc. The changes were mainly a result of technological breakthroughs; unlike many leftists, he is not conspiratorial thinker. The winner of this great transformation was the consumer/investor and the loser was the citizen/wage earner. The consumer has more choices than ever before and at reasonable prices. The investor has unprecedented opportunities to make profits. The citzen, however, is not doing well. The average citizen does not have much voice - other than voting - in the body politic. And on the wage earner has been stagnating for many years. The most salient illustration of this trend is Walmart. Walmart delivers the goods at low prices, but the trade-off is low wages for their employees. We justify this dilemma, as Reich nicely puts it, because "The awkward truth is that most of us are of two minds."

As a left-leaning author, Reich makes some startling pronouncements. One, stop treating corporations as human beings. They are neither moral or immoral, they are merely "bundles of contracts." I couldn't agree more. Stop expecting corporations to be socially responsible, see them for what they are: profit-seeking organizations. Any socially responsible action is a ruse to bolster the bottom line anyway. Don't even encourage them to be socially responsible because it will wrongly lead us to believe that they are solving problems when they are not. Corporations play by the rules that they are given and it is up to citizens and their elected representatives to change the rules.

This is no easy task in the age of supercapitalism. There are currently 38,000 registered lobbyists in Washington DC in a virtual arms race of spending with each other to buy favors from our so-called representatives. The only way citizens can compete with this is not by hiring more lobbyists but advocating through new media outlets such as the internet and cable tv. This, according to Reich, is currently to most effective way to make government more responsive.

The question that remains, after reading this book, is will consumers be willing to sacrifice their low prices to achieve their goals as citizens. If the answer is yes, we can possibly rebalance the equation between democracy and capitalism; if not, we are left to the not so tender mercies of supercapitalism

Мен ако питаш най-добрият строй е този в който всеки сам се спасява а държава няма, или ако еима е с минимални функции. Така и съвсем естествено ако има нужда от гласуване ще гласуват тия които са оцелели и са се оправили, а тия които са чакали някой нещо да им даде и помогне ще са отдавна станали на храна за червеите.

Икономическите решения трябва да се взимат от финансисти или икономисти. Но да се правят икономически решения, примерно, за бюджета по писани и неписани икономически правила БЕЗ да се слуша гласа на народа или само частично зачита, когато изнася/съвпада с вижданията; е меко казано АБСУРДНО.
...
Ако парите, от народа, които отиват в държавата се харчат така че не отразяват (по-)голямата част от исканията / желанията / вижданията / нуждите /потребностите на народа - За 'къв чеп' е тая държава, бюджет и финансови гурута на народа ?

Второ нали на всички е ясно, всички го казаха и се съгласиха, че българина не е отборно животно, нито екипно, нито никакво, то е нещо друго.